Algebraic Models and Complete Proof Calculi for Classical BI
نویسندگان
چکیده
We consider the classical (propositional) version, CBI, of O’Hearn and Pym’s logic of bunched implications (BI) from a modeland proof-theoretic perspective. We make two main contributions in this paper. Firstly, we present a class of algebraic models for CBI which permit the full range of classical multiplicative connectives to be modelled. Our models can be seen as generalisations of Abelian groups, and include several computationally interesting models as concrete instances. Secondly, we give a display calculus proof system for CBI that is an instance of Belnap’s general display logic — hence cut-eliminating — and demonstrate this system to be sound and complete with respect to validity in our models. To achieve the latter, we first define a simple extension of the usual sequent calculus for BI by axioms that directly capture properties of our models, and show this extension to be sound and complete (though not cut-eliminating). Soundness and completeness of our display calculus then follows by establishing faithful translations between the display calculus and this extended sequent calculus.
منابع مشابه
Classical Logic of Bunched Implications
We consider a classical (propositional) version, CBI, of O’Hearn and Pym’s logic of bunched implications (BI) from a modeland prooftheoretic perspective. We present a class of classical models of BI which extend the usual BI-models, based on partial commutative monoids, with an algebraic notion of “resource negation”. This class of models gives rise to natural definitions of multiplicative fals...
متن کاملLinear Logic Properly Displayed
We introduce proper display calculi for intuitionistic, bi-intuitionistic and classical linear logics with exponentials, which are sound, complete, conservative, and enjoy cut-elimination and subformula property. Based on the same design, we introduce a variant of Lambek calculus with exponentials, aimed at capturing the controlled application of exchange and associativity. Properness (i.e. clo...
متن کاملSubstructural Logics on Display
Substructural logics are traditionally obtained by dropping some or all of the structural rules from Gentzen’s sequent calculi LK or LJ. It is well known that the usual logical connectives then split into more than one connective. Alternatively, one can start with the (intuitionistic) Lambek calculus, which contains these multiple connectives, and obtain numerous logics like: exponential-free l...
متن کاملStone-Type Dualities for Separation Logics
Stone-type duality theorems, which relate algebraic and relational/topological models, are important tools in logic because — in addition to elegant abstraction — they strengthen soundness and completeness to a categorical equivalence, yielding a framework through which both algebraic and topological methods can be brought to bear on a logic. We give a systematic treatment of Stone-type duality...
متن کاملBunched Logics Displayed
We formulate a unified display calculus proof theory for the four principal varieties of bunched logic by combining display calculi for their component logics. Our calculi satisfy cut-elimination, and are sound and complete with respect to their standard presentations. We show how to constrain applications of display-equivalence in our calculi in such a way that an exhaustive proof search need ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008